A little test

Discussions relating to the classical guitar which don't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
Denian Arcoleo
Composer
Posts: 6059
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:39 pm
Location: Somerset, England

Re: A little test

Post by Denian Arcoleo » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:41 pm

Fair point. :)

User avatar
Andrew Fryer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:13 pm
Location: London SE5

Re: A little test

Post by Andrew Fryer » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:42 pm

I don't fully understand what the OP's question is. Yes, the thumb work is very harsh, the scale passages sometimes lack fluidity. It is a very dramatic performance, which should make it very good, but there is something in it which smacks of method acting. Something I like about it is that he refuses to make it sound like a Spanish guitar - he is aiming for something, if not authentic, at least more suited to Bach. As such, it is one of many thousands of "good" performances, but not one I'd want to have on a CD.
1975 Calatayud y Gisbert, Yamaha CG131S.

SteveL123
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:05 pm

Re: A little test

Post by SteveL123 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:26 pm

Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:........Guitarists can't take all the blame either - I've come to the conclusion that once a cellist is freed from the shackles of the conductor they lose all control of their metrical sphincter.
...........
I googled "metrical sphincter" and it had nothing to do with timing in music lol. :mrgreen:

Joe de V
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Northern California USA

Re: A little test

Post by Joe de V » Wed Mar 15, 2017 11:31 pm

Well one of the benefits of reading this log is that you learn something new every time. I always though that a "sphincter" was a medical term to describe a group of muscles withing the human body. Every human have them but never heard it used in the musical field - such as a musician loosing "all control of their metrical sphincter" :o

oc chuck
Posts: 324
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:43 pm
Location: orange county, ca.

Re: A little test

Post by oc chuck » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:17 am

90 posts in 4 days! WOW....


Post by Mark Clifton-Gaultier » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:56 am.
"The clue was in the whimsical title of the thread - clearly an error on my part. I should have called it, "Please tell me what you hear?" or something equally direct and maybe avoided the student discussion altogether (though that was what prompted me)."

On first listen I found his playing too harsh.
On the 3rd listen I found a lot to like. I heard more variations in tone volume
and pacing and less harshness. It's not my favorite rendition but well worth several
plays, listening for the variations.

User avatar
bacsidoan
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 1:59 am

Re: A little test

Post by bacsidoan » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:45 am

Joe de V wrote:Mr. Mark Clifton-Gautier: In view of your expert review and as a self identified CG teacher it would be appreciated by a few of us to have the privilege to hear your own playing of this piece so we can learn the "proper" interpretation of it. Thank you,
A good critic of any subject does need good knowledge, but does not have to be a great performer. For example, do you think any of the film critics can direct a good movie? A good sports commentator always has to be a great player of that sport?

khayes
Posts: 1207
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: A little test

Post by khayes » Thu Mar 16, 2017 2:02 am

bacsidoan wrote:
Joe de V wrote:Mr. Mark Clifton-Gautier: In view of your expert review and as a self identified CG teacher it would be appreciated by a few of us to have the privilege to hear your own playing of this piece so we can learn the "proper" interpretation of it. Thank you,
A good critic of any subject does need good knowledge, but does not have to be a great performer. For example, do you think any of the film critics can direct a good movie? A good sports commentator always has to be a great player of that sport?
...or that a man can't be a good obstetrician unless he has a baby? :D
Ken

User avatar
Denian Arcoleo
Composer
Posts: 6059
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:39 pm
Location: Somerset, England

Re: A little test

Post by Denian Arcoleo » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:36 am

I actually don't see what the fuss is about. The video in question is quite well played, with some timing issues and a few harsh sounds. But the player is committed and engaged; it's certainly not terrible. Plus, everyone has off days, I've certainly given some sub-standard performances in my time.

User avatar
Mark Clifton-Gaultier
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:03 pm
Location: England

Re: A little test

Post by Mark Clifton-Gaultier » Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:29 am

May I point out one last time that, in my initial post, I wrote:
Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:I don't want to get involved in a discussion of Mr. Fletcher's work in general - I have never seen him perform elsewhere and he obviously has some facility.
and then:
Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:I am therefore not in the position to give any deep criticism of his guitar playing skills, have offered none and at no point (even now) indicated any specific failings, simply asking the opinion of other forum members on how Bach is generally performed.
I’d be happy if someone can explain how that is not perfectly clear.

I accept that it would be disingenuous to pretend that I don’t find some fault in this particular video, why would I have raised the question otherwise? But I have not indulged in any “player-bashing” or victimisation. As far as I recall the only direct comment that I have made is in describing the interpretation as "loose".


On topic:
The fact that several respondents don’t even appear to know what I’m querying does in fact answer my question to a large degree. Nevertheless I hope that the thread remains open and intact. I’m certainly not offended by any of the comments and anyone that reads the whole thing may draw their own conclusions. My contributions remain complete and unedited.


Off topic:
Joe de V wrote:In view of your expert review ...
What review?? Please quote it.
bacsidoan wrote:
Joe de V wrote:... it would be appreciated by a few of us to have the privilege to hear your own playing of this piece so we can learn the "proper" interpretation of it. Thank you,
A good critic of any subject does need good knowledge, but does not have to be a great performer. For example, do you think any of the film critics can direct a good movie?
Well, I am a performer, but I don't see how my rendering (be it worse or indeed better) would make any difference whatsoever to the discussion. Joe - if you can't hear what I'm asking about in one recording why would you assume that you will hear it in mine, or any other? Still - as you ask so politely and, because it's something that I've been intending to do for some time now, I will look into buying a recording device. How long can you hold your breath?

Pat Dodson
Posts: 2844
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2014 11:32 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: A little test

Post by Pat Dodson » Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:43 am

A Helpful Tone?

"Do too many today have loose metrical sphincters?"
"That's not a nice thing to say!
A player might have many things that can hinder
Their performance on any one day."

"Acknowledged but really that's not what we asked
Our question related to pulse."
"Maybe, but our answers relate to to the way
Evisceration makes us revulse."

"Excuse me," a third voice interjects from afar
"As your debate grows more lengthy and fruitier
Have you thought of the chap who made the guitar
And considered the plight of the luthier?"
Last edited by Pat Dodson on Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
petermc61
Posts: 5865
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:11 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: A little test

Post by petermc61 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:51 am

Very witty Pat.

Joe de V
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Northern California USA

Re: A little test

Post by Joe de V » Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:20 pm

Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:May I point out one last time that, in my initial post, I wrote:
Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:I don't want to get involved in a discussion of Mr. Fletcher's work in general - I have never seen him perform elsewhere and he obviously has some facility.
and then:
Mark Clifton-Gaultier wrote:I am therefore not in the position to give any deep criticism of his guitar playing skills, have offered none and at no point (even now) indicated any specific failings, simply asking the opinion of other forum members on how Bach is generally performed.
I’d be happy if someone can explain how that is not perfectly clear.

I accept that it would be disingenuous to pretend that I don’t find some fault in this particular video, why would I have raised the question otherwise? But I have not indulged in any “player-bashing” or victimisation. As far as I recall the only direct comment that I have made is in describing the interpretation as "loose".


On topic:
The fact that several respondents don’t even appear to know what I’m querying does in fact answer my question to a large degree. Nevertheless I hope that the thread remains open and intact. I’m certainly not offended by any of the comments and anyone that reads the whole thing may draw their own conclusions. My contributions remain complete and unedited.


Off topic:
Joe de V wrote:In view of your expert review ...
What review?? Please quote it.
bacsidoan wrote:
Joe de V wrote:... it would be appreciated by a few of us to have the privilege to hear your own playing of this piece so we can learn the "proper" interpretation of it. Thank you,
A good critic of any subject does need good knowledge, but does not have to be a great performer. For example, do you think any of the film critics can direct a good movie?
Well, I am a performer, but I don't see how my rendering (be it worse or indeed better) would make any difference whatsoever to the discussion. Joe - if you can't hear what I'm asking about in one recording why would you assume that you will hear it in mine, or any other? Still - as you ask so politely and, because it's something that I've been intending to do for some time now, I will look into buying a recording device. How long can you hold your breath?
Hello bacsidoan, Thank you for your observations on my comments. Based on the original "opinion" as written, Mr. Clifton-Gautier is a tutor-teacher of CG and as such he indicated that he would not have a student of his perform in such manner. That to me sounded like a very strong statement regarding the performer.He does not have to be a concert-level performer but he appears to indicate that he knows what a concert-level performance of a piece should sound like. For that reason alone I would like to hear/see him or one of his students perform the piece in the manner that is acceptable to him. To be truthful, I would consider Mr. Clifton-Gautier as a possible teacher who would expect and demand of me, were I to be his student, nothing but the best of my ability and skills . My log only addressed his "strong" views of the video performer's skill.

Regarding Mr. Clifton-Gautier inquiry about ..."what review"? ;In his comments he did did say ...I am not in the position to give any "deep criticism" of his guitar playing skills-have offered none... :?: I take that statement to mean that his remarks were a simple- not- too-deep opinion of the performer.I can now imagine what he would have said if he wanted to make it a "deep" opinion. I am not a very good CG player I play for my own enjoyment but I am reasonable good in interpreting written language. Maybe i missed the real message he was making in his log.

TheCardMaker
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 2:16 pm
Location: Doncaster, England

Re: A little test

Post by TheCardMaker » Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:57 pm

Ugh... this thread is ugly

I'm shocked that an individual would be used as an example like this. It's so sad that technique is seen as something like a currency, I picture the critics with fat cigars in their mouths as they scoff over a good mans livelihood

As if a student needs to understand the shortcomings of this particular performance, the discussion has not been about poor technique but about aspects which (evidently) lots of players cannot even hear. I think the whole 'don't show it to my students' line is a smokescreen personally. You should be ashamed of yourselves, a forum is a place where we support each other, not put each other down

Just my opinion

Joe de V
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Northern California USA

Re: A little test

Post by Joe de V » Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:35 pm

This thread started with a simple message indicating how it came about. An e-mail link with a titled "Bizarre". Mr. Clinton -Gautier was the recipient and he proceeded to verse his opinion of it. That is a reasonable action on his part. What I believe started the long and winded discussion was the content of his views about what he heard and observe on the video. From a teacher point of view I can certainly understand his response - If I were to be his student I would expect a truthful answer to my performance.good-bad-or very different. The possible problem I see is that his opinion was one that was published here for everyone to read. A more cautious response would have been to address the sender of the ""Bizzare" video.
I would certainly expect as my teacher to tell me what he felt was missing on my playing - this would be a one to one conversation between teacher and student. I believe most of us can accept a tutor in any situation involving teacher-student to do us the favor by correcting and indicating our apparent deficiency in this case playing a musical instrument, however I would not want him to publish any criticism of my playing to the public.
What appears to be the somewhat negative response from some of us readers was that it was made public in this forum instead than responding directly to the sender.

Nick Clow
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Murwillumbah, Australia

Re: A little test

Post by Nick Clow » Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:40 am

Good grief.

Mark

Whilst I have been concerned about the possible distress or damage caused by this thread to Peter Fletcher, I am now more concerned at the damage to your standing.

It is a car crash of a thread. No conciliation appears possible. One vote for its deletion.
formerly Edward Frillypants

Return to “Public Space”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chantysboy7, CommonCrawl [Bot], eno, HomerB, josswinn, khayes, Marco32, Mike Atkinson, OldPotter, Pat Dodson, Ray, RicardoMarcos, Stephen Kenyon, WilliamSchart and 22 guests