Get Real

Discussions relating to the classical guitar which don't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
Tom Poore
Posts: 1005
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: South Euclid, Ohio, USA

Re: Get Real

Post by Tom Poore » Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:41 pm

Peter Lovett wrote:I suppose what I am saying in a long-winded way is that my practice sessions are not a search for perfection as I doubt that at my age I will ever be able to achieve that but they are a search for being a musician. I could not embrace the "play it 5 times perfectly then move on" school of thought (didn't Sor or was it Tarrega play something 50 times without a mistake before he moved on) because there is no guarantee that the 6th time will fall apart. Nor am I practicing as though its a performance. Its not, there are times I am going to play something over and over to get a muscle-memory because its new. Thats not a performance, but musically, well yes, that is what I am trying for.
Perfection is impossible. That doesn’t mean we should give up on it. But we should have a clear idea of just what we’re striving for.

When I was young, I got interested in making my own telescope. (Alas, I never did it.) Reading about grinding and polishing a mirror for a reflector telescope, I encountered something called the “one-fourth wave rule.” It states that if an optical surface is polished to be accurate within one-fourth of a wavelength of light, then for practical purposes it’s perfect. In sum, it’s a threshold. Once you’re there, you needn’t push for anything more. To do so invokes the law of diminishing returns.

This is a good idea for musicians. Of course we need to refine our playing. But we also need our own version of the one-fourth wave rule. There’s a threshold that, once we reach it, then we’re by any reasonable standard playing as though perfect. In fact, beavering away past this threshold is self-defeating. First, extreme perfectionism is a black hole, destroying all that fall into it. Second, perfection pushed too far enervates all that makes a performance alive. I’ve noticed that my favorite players—Julian Bream in his prime, for example—aren’t the cleanest. Great playing always embraces the element of chance. Not everything can be planned, nor should it be. Smart performing artists learn to live with uncertainty.

I’m not arguing that we toss perfection in the bin. Nor is this an excuse for sloppy playing. Rather, we need a definition of perfection that comprises more than marksmanship. Like everything we work at in music, perfection is a evolving goal. The more we explore it, the more interesting it becomes.

Tom Poore
South Euclid, OH

User avatar
Posts: 1778
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: England

Re: Get Real

Post by lucy » Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:58 pm

Sean Shibe wrote:
Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:00 am
I should also add that a practise session is as useful a forum for exploration as a forum for the pursuit of a flawless performance; the sole aim of technically perfect performance can result, in the short term, in a sterile interpretation. In the long term, more dangerously, it can lead to a general lack of imaginative musical scope.
Thanks so much for contributing to this thread Sean. I'm sure what you say is very interesting to us all. And I'd humbly like to say I agree that practice time is not just about preparing the way for a flawless performance. I think it's about exploring the music and deciding upon phrasing, tone colours, dynamics etc. as well as becoming better at physically playing the music.

I don't know what people views on this are, but my method is to gradually get to know a piece, over TIME, by playing it quite a lot, then I slowly decide upon what I'm going to with it, musically. As I keep playing it, rather casually, I might add, I put in, or play with, more and more expressive qualities, again over time, until I have built up an aural picture in my head, as to how I want it to sound. Then, I work towards achieving that. I certainly don't look at the score and attempt to play it as accurately and quickly as possible. The point about working towards the aural picture, is I have to improve my technical capacity to play the piece, in order to achieve it. I don't know how usual this method is. Any thoughts?
“Do what you can, with what you have, where you are”. Theodore Roosevelt

Return to “Public Space”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Altophile, cgratham, chuckinphoenix, CommonCrawl [Bot], gitgeezer, Hotsoup and 26 guests