In the days of the Model-T ford, Henry Ford is reputed to have said "you can have any color so long as it is black". As guitars became mass produced items someone somewhere standardised on the 52mm/650mm set up. It became a de facto standard for mass production. So the chances are that many professionals today learned on it.edcat7 wrote:Thanks for the reply. But why is 52 mm and 65cm scale length the standard? Why do professional players use this size?
I think Susan makes a couple of great points here. I have medium size hands and slightly pudgy finger tips. I like 52mm much better than 50 and liked the one 54mm I played. In some ways it is easier to get to certain positions with the smaller nut width and narrower string spacing. But, for me, it is less difficult to play each note more cleanly without muting or buzzing strings with more space. I'm sure there gets to be a point of diminishing returns on that and I didn't play the 54mm for more that half an hour so I don't know if there would have been issues with playing it long term.SusanGRas wrote:I would personally think about what size I wanted for a bit before ordering. 52 and 50 are a big difference to me. I have small hands and do not like 50 mm. 51 is very comfortable and 52 works. As was mentioned they may have started thinner but then went much wider, wider than todays standard. Standard is always an interesting concept. I guess it fits the majority of people. I also find that 52 mm of one luthier can be different from a 52 mm of another because of the actual neck profile. Perhaps the luthier you are going with might have a sample or two to try out.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], DaveLeeNC, Doug Ingram, Francisco, johnparchem, KamHon Leung, Les Backshall, MessyTendon, nokturnal, souldier, Tim522, Waddy Thomson, Yahoo [Bot] and 41 guests