I've done that a few times. Seems the logical thing to do because the lapse between playing each string is just a second or even less. As a comparison it's as good as you are ever going to get. I've even swapped their positions. It's just a bit time consuming, especially if you wish to compare all 6 strings. I can't say I've ever done that, just the outer E's.Contreras wrote:This seems like an obvious idea , but it's only just occurred to me ... maybe I'm a bit slow.
It's hard to remember qualia, such as the qualities of a string, and to compare them in one's mind when one has taken one off and put another on. So how about putting them both on at once? Say stringing another G in the D position .... obviously you couldn´t play a regular piece, but you could make a direct and meaningfull comparison.
Will be meeting her at a local music store on Monday. If I get the chance I will ask her more about this. Should be interesting.ashworth wrote:Seems a good idea, if tedious. I remember that in Sharon Isbin's book, she relates comparing high e strings by putting 6 on at once.
6 e Strings will definitely sound different from bass to treble: bracing structure beneath the string, different action height (saddle shape) and transferring string vibrations to the top at a different position on the soundboard. These variations will also alter the fundamental/harmonics relationship.Pede wrote:I once put 6 different e strings on my guitar, like Sharon Isbin mentioned.
I doubt it was a good comparison because I thought the strings sounded different on the bas side of the guitar than the treble side. I did switch also. Maybe this is due to the difference in bracingpattern above and under. Could this be possible?
Actually they sounded better on the bass side...
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 13 guests