Sagreras_Obras_para_guitarra for proof-readers

Here you can help by pointing out any mistakes in notes, fingering, tempo, dynamic markings, composers' dates, spelling, or bar (measure) numbering that you may find in the forum PDFs.
Please indicate the volume, title of the piece, page number and bar number, to make it easier to check.
User avatar
Denis Paradis
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: Sept-Iles, Qc

Sagreras_Obras_para_guitarra for proof-readers

Post by Denis Paradis » Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:44 pm

Original (Part 1)

1. The introduction title and next section are above the score instead of alongside it. At least move Habanera a bit if it is not possible to lay it as on the original.
1Intro.png
2Intro.png
2. Measure 5 & 6 second beat. The indication is for a triplet feel, not 7.
3Meas5.png
4Meas5.png
3. Meas. 23 second beat, extraneous sharp sign on the C.
5Meas23.png
6Meas23.png
4. Meas 32 first beat the E is missing a dot.
7Meas32.png
8Meas32.png
5. Meas 33 & 34 second beat. The indication is for a triplet feel, not 7.
9Meas33.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
“Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music”

- Rachmaninov

User avatar
Denis Paradis
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: Sept-Iles, Qc

Re: Sagreras_Obras_para_guitarra for proof-readers

Post by Denis Paradis » Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:45 pm

Original (Part 2)

6. Meas 61 second beat missing a liaison indication.
10Meas61.png
11Meas61.png
7. Meas 66 first beat the “G” is misaligned, needs to be shifted to the right that is probably because there is a quarter note rest missing on the second beat.
12Meas66.png
13Meas66.png
End
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
“Music is enough for a lifetime, but a lifetime is not enough for music”

- Rachmaninov

User avatar
Douglas1947
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 7:36 pm
Location: Hyattsville, Maryland

Re: Sagreras_Obras_para_guitarra for proof-readers

Post by Douglas1947 » Wed May 17, 2017 8:12 pm

El Rosarino opus 52, pages 164-166

I think in measure 72, the bass note should be A, not Bb - because it is part of the F major chord.
Same for measure 91, the bass note should be A, not Bb - because it is the bass note of the A minor chord.

Douglas

Return to “Updates and amendments to scores”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 2 guests